April 30, 2014

Taking Time Out for Tony Talk: 2014 Edition

The Tony nominations announced yesterday morning were as perplexing as ever. Maybe even more so. As happens every year, some “sure things” got left out (almost none of the big name movie stars who appeared on Broadway this season got nominated, although the New York Post columnist Michael Riedel says Denzel Washington came close for his performance in A Raisin in the Sun; click here to read how he just missed the mark).  Meanwhile some who-wouda-thunk-its managed to make the list (I’m too polite to name those names). You can see all the nominees by clicking here.

Shows that failed to score as big as they’d hoped have already begun posting closing notices. Estelle Parsons, who missed performances last weekend due to illness, picked up a Best Actress in a Play nomination for The Velocity of Autumn but the show earned just 11% of its potential gross last week and the producers, figuring that the sole nomination of their 86-year-old star wasn’t enough, announced that the two-hander, which also stars Stephen Spinella, will close this weekend.
As usual, people are grinning, or gnashing their teeth, through it all. But the biggest surprise of the day is that gnashing hardest of all is the New York Times critic Charles Isherwood. A passionate champion of the playwright Will Eno, Isherwood was so upset that Eno’s play The Realistic Joneses got totally shut out that he callously dissed the four plays that did get nominated (click here to read what he wrote).  

The 33 nominators (click here to see who they were) did some dissing of their own too. Tom Kitt and Brian Yorkey, the team behind the new musical If/Then, and Jason Robert Brown, who wrote my favorite of the season The Bridges of Madison County, are much admired by the Broadway community. But while Kitt and Brown got nods for their scores, their shows got shut out of the running for the all-important Best Musical award. 
Similarly, as the New York Times’ Patrick Healy pointed out in his smart analysis of this year's slate (click here to read what he had to say) all of the folks who directed new plays were passed over and the Best Director of a Play slots went to the guys who did revivals. 

But the truth of the matter is that the nominating committee had a harder time this year. There were no frontrunners, shows like The Book of Mormon or even last year’s winner Kinky Boots that roused passionate emotions (Isherwood excepted, of course). 

So the nominators obviously just went with their gut feelings. And there was a lot of good stuff to choose from over the past 12 months and work that is worthy of winning the awards that will be announced at the ceremony that CBS will broadcast on June 8. 

But with a field this wide open (A Gentleman’s Guide to Love & Murder picked up 10 nominations but still isn’t a sure thing for the top prize) the debates are going to be fiercer than ever. 

So once again, my theatergoing buddy Bill and I have decided to weigh in with one of our occasional recorded conversations. Click the orange button below to hear us sound off on what we thought of the choices, the non-choices and the Isherwood outburst:  

April 26, 2014

"Of Mice and Men" is Mighty Damn Good

Appearing in a Broadway play has become almost as popular with Hollywood stars as having a charity of their own. Of course, some Hollywood actors—Al Pacino, Meryl Streep, Denzel Washington—have long been as adept onstage as they are onscreen. But others are so tentative once they get in front of a live audience that you can see the fear in their eyes and that apprehension can throw off the entire production.

Luckily, the latter is not the case with James Franco and Chris O’Dowd, who seem totally at home onstage as the odd-couple drifters George and Lennie in the poignant revival of John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men that opened at the Longacre Theatre last week.
The novella on which Steinbeck based the play has been a standby in middle and high school English classes almost since he first published it back in 1937 (click here to read about the history of the play). 

So you probably already know the story of the migrant workers who move from one back-breaking job to the next in California’s Salinas Valley, all the while dreaming of saving enough money to buy a small farm of their own where they can "live of the fat of the land.” 

But the odds are stacked against people like George and Lennie and the other forgotten men with whom they share a bunkhouse on the ranch that is their latest job. A series of confrontations with the boss’ bully-boy son Curly and Curly’s restless wife leads up to one of the most affecting scenes in American literature. 
Franco plays George, who is the savvy one of the duo, and the role is a great choice for this actor, whose well-publicized moonlighting as a grad student, a poet and a conceptual artist makes it clear that he takes pleasure in showing off his own smarts (click here to read a pre-opening interview with the actor).  

Franco has been angling to carve a Broadway notch on his belt of accomplishments. He and Nicole Kidman were supposed to do a revival of Tennessee Williams’ Sweet Bird of Youth three years ago (click here to jog your memory on that one) but that production never got off the ground.

He’s obviously had better luck with Of Mice and Men and while Franco doesn’t deliver a wow performance, his intelligence and natural charisma do make him compelling to watch. 

There’s no fear in his eyes either. Or anywhere else, for that matter. When New York Times critic Ben Brantley failed to cheer Franco’s performance, the actor took to Twitter with a controversial pan of his own (click here to read about that).

But the true star of this production turns out to be O’Dowd. I’d wrinkled my nose when I heard that the actor best known for comedic roles in TV shows like HBO’s “Girls” and movies like “Bridesmaids” and “Dinner for Schmucks” was going to play Lennie, the emotional heart of this tragic story. What I didn’t know is that the Irish-born O’Dowd also has a bunch of stage credits to his name.   

And it shows. Lennie is a hulk of a man who has the mind of a child, but O’Dowd doesn’t portray him as just some generic mentally-disabled giant. He turns Lennie into a real person, innocent at moments, devious at others, heartbreaking throughout. It’s a terrific performance.

But the entire production, directed with great finesse by Anna D. Shapiro, is first rate. Todd Rosenthal’s striking set, seeming to have emerged from a Walker Evans or Dorothea Lange photo, evokes the stark beauty of the Dust Bowl era and is beautifully lit by Japhy Weideman.

And the supporting case is uniformly excellent, although I can’t help giving a shout-out to Jim Norton, particularly moving as an elderly worker who lost a hand in an accident and knows that he will eventually be put aside as easily as the aging dog who is taken from him and shot at the beginning of the play. 
The only weak spot is Leighton Meester, the whippet-thin actress who made a name for herself on the TV show “Gossip Girl.” She plays the sole woman in the show, the character known only as Curly’s wife. 

Meester gets points for trying a different take that attempts to bring a more innocent quality to a character usually played as a floozy. But the actress lacks the chops to bring it off.

Some people, including my theatergoing buddy Bill, have complained that Of Mice and Men is too old-fashioned, too melodramatic and too-well made with too much foreshadowing and telegraphing of what’s to come. 

But none of that bothered me. I like a play that knows where it wants to go and is confident enough to share its direction with the audience. And I like even better when, like this production, it knows how to get there.   

April 23, 2014

Wishing William Shakespeare a Happy 450!

The spring season is firing along on all cylinders. Six shows are opening this week. The Outer Critics Circle announced its nominations yesterday (click here to see them), the Drama League list comes out today and the Tony nods are due next Tuesday. So there's a lot to talk about but what kind of theater lover would I be if I didn't take time out to acknowledge the momentous event of the 450th anniversary of Shakespeare’s birth today.

I’m not going to pretend that I have anything new to say about the Bard but lots of other people seem to and I've been collecting pieces they've posted over the last few weeks. You can see them all in “All The World’s A Stage,” a Flipboard magazine I put together to celebrate the occasion and that you can find by clicking here.

April 19, 2014

How "Aladdin" Worked Its Magic on Me

Standing ovations have become so much a part of the Broadway theater-going experience that the producer Ken Davenport recently conducted a survey to find out why people keep jumping up at the end of shows (click here to read the results.)  

But no survey is needed at the new Disney musical Aladdin, which has begun what will probably be a long run at the New Amsterdam Theatre. Because the standing-O comes towards the end of the first act and it's clear, at least it was at the performance my sister Joanne and I saw, that pure joy is bringing people to their feet.  

Say what you will about the folks at Disney Theatrical (and people have said plenty about how its cartoon-to-musical transfers are just assembly line products) they know how to put on crowd-pleasing entertainment. 

Aladdin is adapted from the beloved Arabian Nights folktale about a poor boy who finds a magic lamp and discovers that rubbing it releases a genie who will grant his wishes. Aladdin uses his wishes to become rich, woos the beautiful daughter of the sultan and thwarts an evil vizier who threatens to take over the kingdom.

The 1992 film version, best remembered for Robin Williams’ antic voicing of the genie, has always been the most jokey of the company’s animated films and the stage show is just as unabashedly silly, filled with the same kind of low-brow humor and bad puns like "Dancing with the Scimitars." 
The show's tuneful score by Alan Menken with clever lyrics by Howard Ashman, who died from AIDS before the project was done, and Tim Rice is the same one that won an Oscar for the film version and was a repeat play mainstay for many Gen-Xers. 

Menken has added a couple of news songs for the stage version and additional lyrics have been written by Chad Beguelin, who wrote the book, which changes a few talking-animal characters into human ones and tones down some of the potentially offensive ethnic references that might have slipped by in 1992 but wouldn’t today. 
Aladdin's exuberant song-and dance-routines are devised by Casey Nicholaw, who both directs and and choreographs the show. The resulting production numbers—which throw in everything from big band riffs and Broadway send-ups to pop cultural shout-outs and circus-style acrobatics—literally beg you to like them. And it’s hard to say no.  

The numbers are performed by an energetic—and typically for Disney, multi-ethnic—cast of 34. There are a couple of familiar faces—or voices—among them. Jonathan Freeman who provided the voice for the vizier Jafar in the film now gets to play him on stage. And Clifton Davis, who was nominated for a Tony back in 1972 as one of The Two Gentlemen from Verona, plays the sultan.

But betting on the long game, Disney tends not to cast names in its shows so that the roles will be easily replaceable over lengthy runs. So it's found two fresh-faced young leads for Aladdin. Courtney Reed is appropriately pretty and perky, even if a touch bland, as Princess Jasmine. But Adam Jacobs is totally winning as the title character. 
As in the movie, however, the true star of the show is the Genie, here played by James Monroe Iglehart. Instead of trying to fill Williams shoes, Iglehart has created a flashy pair of his own (click here to read an interview with him). 

A large black guy (6 feet and 220 lbs.) with a bald head and a mischievous smile, he is quick with the quips and charmingly light on his feet. It’s his rendition of “Friend Like Me” that stops the show.

Iglehart is terrific and is sure to be on all the awards ballots but he’s not the only reason to see Aladdin. Gregg Barnes’ midriff and chest-baring costumes—and there seem to be yards of them—are vibrantly colored, lavishly decorated and almost worth the price of admission. 

Bob Crowley’s storybook sets are just as delightfully vivid. And there are marvelous feats of magic devised by illusion designer Jim Steinmeyer, including a how-do-they-do-that flying carpet.
But unlike The Lion King or Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin isn’t the kind of show to win the hearts of critics (it’s scored only a grudging B on StageGrade, which aggregates the reviews of the top New York critics; click here to see some of what they had to say). 

For unlike its rivals for this year's Tony for Best Musical, Aladdin isn't trying to be the kind of serious or groundbreaking show that folks who consider themselves high-brow theatergoers like.  And I can't say it's my favorite show of the season either. But it is the one where I've had the most fun.

April 16, 2014

"The Library" Isn't as Savvy as It Should Be

Moviemaking—the old-fashioned kind with people and plots but no aliens or armageddons—has become so rare in Hollywood that there’s been a mass migration of some of its best talent into TV…
and the theater.  

The latest high-profile name seeking refuge within a proscenium is the Oscar-winning director Steven Soderbergh, who last year announced that he was giving up movies and is now making his theatrical debut at the helm of The Library, a new ripped-from-the-headlines drama that opened at The Public Theater last night and plays thru next weekend.

The plot centers on the aftermath of a Columbine-style high school massacre. As in the real-life tragedy, the media latches onto the tale of a girl who reportedly prayed before being shot. But the play’s central character is another girl named Caitlin Gabriel, who survived the shooting but is accused by another survivor of telling the killer where some of her classmates were hiding.

Caitlin says she didn’t do it and thus the stage is set for a substantive examination of contemporary issues like the devastating effect trauma can have on a community and the destructive ways in which the media can complicate the healing process. A different production might have delivered on all of that potential but this one doesn’t do it.
The Library is written by Scott Z. Burns, a screenwriter with whom Soderbergh has collaborated on such films as “The Informant,” “Contagion” and “Side Effects.” The play marks Burns’ stage debut as well and the production might have been better off if one of its creators had had more stage experience. Because The Library comes across more as the treatment for a movie than a fully realized play (click here to read about their adjustment process).

Soderbergh, so fluent in the art of filmmaking that he often serves as his own cinematographer, hasn’t a clue about how to stage a play. He has created one arresting image: as the audience enters the theater, a girl is lying still on a table lit by an oddly unsettling blue light. But his imagination seems to fail him after that. 
For the rest of the play, he just directs his actors to walk on, face the audience, say their lines and then walk off. Sometimes they stand on one of the five tables that constitute the play’s entire set. At other times, a light flashes, signaling the beginning or end of a scene, like a fill-in for the cut-to cues in a film.

But even under those circumstances, some of the acting is quite good. The 17-year-old actress Chloë Grace Moretz is another stage newcomer but she is able to turn her callowness into the vulnerability that Caitlin struggles with (click here to read more about the actress). Meanwhile, Michael O’Keefe manages to convey the subtle nuances of a father who wants to believe his daughter but can’t get beyond his doubts.
Jennifer Westfeldt and Lili Taylor don’t fare as well as, respectively, Caitlin’s mom and the mother of the dead girl who prayed during the attack. Each of their characters is given just one note to play, revealing shamefully too little of what these fine actresses can do. 

I also found it disappointing that Burns and Soderbergh seemed to take religion seriously at the start of the play but then quickly fall back on clichés about the malevolence of people of faith.
And yet, I still found myself wanting to see what Soderbegh and Burns might do back on their home turf with a movie version of this story. I suppose I’ll just have to hope that Soderbergh changes his mind about filmmaking. And if I'd had the courage I could have asked him. 

After the show, my husband K and I had dinner at the Public’s new restaurant, which, a little confusingly, is called The Library. The restaurant is obviously convenient, the food is fine and the prices not awful but it’s probably not the best place for an honest conversation about how you feel about the show you just saw.
A few minutes after we sat down, Soderbergh came in with the actress Jennifer Ehle and joined some friends at a table near ours. In true New-Yorkers-know-how-to-give-celebrities-their-privacy fashion, we pretended not to notice.  Or to notice that Stephen Sondheim and his frequent collaborator John Weidman were sitting across the room from us. 

April 12, 2014

"Red Velvet" Could Use A Little More Texture

Ira Aldridge, the first black man to play Othello before a white audience, is a fascinating character. And Adrian Lester, who recently played the Moor in an acclaimed production by London’s National Theatre, can be a compelling actor. So I wish I could say that I enjoyed Lester’s portrayal of Aldridge in Red Velvet, the biodrama now running at St. Ann’s Warehouse through April 20, as much as so many other folks apparently have (click here to read some of the raves).  

But, alas, Red Velvet struck me too much like those shows you find at historical museums or highfalutin amusement parks: the intentions are noble, all the teaching moments are observed and the result is as lively as a diorama at a wax museum. 
And that’s a real shame in this case because Aldridge’s life is inherently dramatic. Born in New York City to free black parents just 30 years after the Declaration of Independence was signed, he began appearing in all-black productions while still in his teens and then headed to Europe, believing, like so many black artists over the years, that he might find less prejudice and more opportunities there. 

And indeed he did, not only breaking the theatrical color barrier in England at a time when that country was hotly debating ending its part in the slave trade, but touring throughout Europe and becoming a celebrity in Germany, Russia and other Eastern European countries. 

But Aldridge still confronted bigotry throughout his career. He never appeared in London again after his Othello debut at Covent Garden in 1833 and although he hoped to return and perform in the U.S., he died and was buried in Poland two years after the Civil War ended.

The play, written by Lester’s wife Lolita Chakrabarti, begins with Aldridge's final tour and then flashes back to his breakthrough performance in Othello as a last-minute and highly controversial replacement for the great actor Edmund Kean, who had collapsed onstage and was unable to finish the run. Like all bio-works, it gooses the facts in an attempt to make its story more dramatic but the effort only partly succeeds. 

Some of the responsibility for that falls on the script. It may be time to declare a moratorium on having the subject of a bio-play relive his past in response to questions from a journalist; meanwhile Kean’s actor son, who in real life had amiably worked with Aldridge before the Covent Garden performance, is presented as an out-and-out racist.

But part of the blame also rests with director Indhu Rubasingham who hasn’t found a clear way to delineate the time shifts, key moments or, in some cases, even the characters. Three of the play’s eight actors play multiple roles, which is particularly confusing when one woman is called upon to portray Aldridge’s British wife, an actress with whom he has a dalliance and the young journalist who wants to write about him.

There are, however, moments of fun, like when the current day actors imitate the pose-and-yell declamatory performance style of their 19th century predecessors.  And Lester gives one of his characteristic all-emotions-to-the-surface performances (click here to read a piece by the actor on how he approached this performance).   

Lester is, no surprise, quite wonderful when delivering parts of Othello’s speeches and he is also quite poignant in Red Velvet’s final scene.  So much so that my husband K (already a big Lester fan from the actor’s TV caper series “Hustle”) is now lobbying for a return engagement of the NT Live screening of Othello (click here to read more about it).  That also may be the better way to pay tribute to Aldridge.

April 9, 2014

Go See "The Bridges of Madison County"

The new musical The Bridges of Madison County isn’t doing well. And I’m not sure why. It’s based on the 1992 novel about the star-crossed love affair between a war bride turned Iowa housewife named Francesca and a peripatetic photographer named Robert that sold some 50 million copies.  The 1995 movie version with Meryl Streep and Clint Eastwood took in over $180 million. And this new musical, with a gorgeous score by Jason Robert Brown and sensational performances by Kelli O’Hara and Steven Pasquale is the best interpretation yet.

Maybe the show isn’t doing so well because even though it has an 18 member-cast, it’s an intimate production that doesn’t have people flying around the auditorium, hydraulic scenery that menaces the audience, songs from the baby boomer era or flashy Hollywood names that make people feel they’re getting their money’s worth when they shell out over a hundred bucks per ticket. 
But what The Bridges of Madison County does have is an engaging and affecting book by Marsha Norman that would be right at home in the Golden Age of musicals, to-swoon-for ballads by Brown and two great-looking and great-sounding leads, all brought together by Bartlett Sher's deft direction which nimbly walks the line between romance and schmaltz.

The show is both cinematic and theatrical. Scenes flow from Francesca’s farmhouse to the state fair, where her husband (played with unshowy dignity by Hunter Foster) and children have gone away for the weekend to show off their prized pig and, of course there are detours to the state’s famed covered bridges (click here to read about the impressionistic set).  

But Norman (click here to read an interview with her) and Sher have opened up the story to bring in the townspeople, who provide a little comic relief and sit along the sides of the stage in Our Town-style, a moral presence even when not directly involved in the action.

Meanwhile, Brown, who has been Broadway’s next big thing ever since he won the Tony for Parade back in 1998 (click here to read a profile of him) pours all of his prodigious talent into a score that ranges from Americana to operetta. And although I would have liked a few more upbeat numbers, I could listen to the songs he’s created for this show endlessly.

Brown actually wrote the part of Francesca for O’Hara, who is the Julie Andrews of her generation, a pretty woman with a beautiful voice and the ability to play both comedy and drama. And O’Hara has never been better than she is here as a complex woman who’s resigned herself to a simple life and then is given one final chance at something more.

I’ve always admired O’Hara (how could one not?) although her cool perfection kept me from being a true fan. But the actress had her second child last fall and is still a little pudgy, which gives her a vulnerability that helps make her portrayal of Francesca entirely believable (even though it calls for her to be a brunette with an Italian accent) and made me ready to sign up for full membership in the Kelli O’Hara fan club (click her to read a Q&A with her).  
O’Hara’s co-star Pasquale is, of course, a certified hunk but he doesn’t rest on his pectoral laurels but brings an inner sadness to Robert that makes it clear why this man of the world would so want this farmer’s wife. I can’t imagine hetero women of any age being able to resist his yearning. 

And all this is why I can’t figure out why the show isn’t getting better word of mouth and doing better at the box office. I’m guessing that the producers are trying to hang on until the awards nominations, particularly those for the Tonys, are announced later this month.

But the competition will be stiff because this has been an unusually prolific season for new musicals (an even dozen have opened over the past eight months) and the race for best actress (with O'Hara facing off against Sutton Foster, Audra McDonald, Marin Mazzie, Idina Menzel and Jessie Mueller) will be particularly fierce.  
The Tony administration committee recently voted to expand the number of candidates for some categories (click here to read more about that). And the jockeying for frontrunner and underdog status has already begun. Singer-songwriter Carole King showed up at Beautiful, the bio-show based on her early life, this past weekend (click here to read about that). 

The Bridges of Madison County may not have that kind of card to pull out of its sleeve and I confess that I haven’t yet seen all of its rivals, but I’m still keeping my fingers crossed that this underappreciated gem is given the chance it needs to shine.

April 5, 2014

An "I Remember Mama" Worth Remembering

Back in the days when both writers and audiences prized loving families as much as dysfunctional ones, people couldn’t get enough of the Hansons, a poor but close-knit clan of Norwegian-American immigrants living in San Francisco during the 1910s.

They were the subject of the bestselling memoir “Mama’s Bank Account,” which was adapted into the 1944 John Van Druten play I Remember Mama (in which Marlon Brando made his Broadway debut) the 1948 movie starring Irene Dunne, a TV show that ran for eight years and the last musical that Richard Rodgers wrote before he died in 1979. 
Now, they’re back in a high-concept revival of Van Druten’s play that the Transport Group Theatre Company opened last Sunday in The Gym at Hudson. And I couldn’t be more pleased.
The film was one of my favorites when I was a kid. The “Million Dollar Movie,” the TMC of my youth that ran one movie for a whole week, showed it often. And I watched it so many times that the characters are still as familiar to me as those in my own family.  
So I was initially worried when I read that all the members of the family—male, female, young and old, from the tomboy baby sister Dagmar to the gruff old family patriarch Uncle Chris—were going to be played by women old enough to qualify for Medicare.

And the first few minutes did seem gimmicky. The playing space in the old gym has been filled with 10 dining room tables, each filled with props referenced in the plot—one was covered entirely with vintage typewriters, another with old books, a third with cash boxes like the one in which the titular character kept the money the family used to pay its bills. 
The 10 actresses in the cast walked on dressed in contemporary slacks and tops and wearing only the most minimal makeup. But none of it mattered as the scenes unfolded, a series of vignettes detailing the kind of funny and sad moments that make up the collective memory of every family and that become dearer over the years with each retelling.

Only two of the actresses play single characters: Barbara Barrie, now 82 but somehow totally believable as the teenage Katrin who yearns to be a writer, and Barbara Andres, 74, warm and unflappable as Mama. 

The other eight slip convincingly in and out of multiple roles—slightly deepening the voice to play Papa, eldest brother Nels or the British boarder who reads classic books to the family in the evening, or straightening their spine to portray the haughtiness of the busybody aunts Jenny and Sigrid or the quiet dignity of Uncle Chris' mistress Jessie.

Actresses, particularly older ones who too often get cast as dowdy grannies in dramas and randy ones in comedies, get so few chances to show off all that they can do. And it’s evident that, under the encouraging direction of Jack Cummings III, all 10 of these vets are relishing the chance to fill a stage with their talent and love of their craft.
I was totally charmed. But I was also a little angry that playwrights aren’t creating more parts for women like these—or that matter, for their younger sisters.  It may have made sense that Shakespeare, writing for a troupe of all-male actors, wrote so comparatively few strong female parts.  But there’s no excuse for the playwrights of today. Not when actors like these are around and creating memorable moments in the theater like this.

April 2, 2014

"Breathing Time" Passes the Time Nicely

Beau Willimon’s first play, Farragut North, was produced by the Atlantic Theater Company with John Gallagher and Chris Noth in the lead roles and then turned into the movie “The Ides of March,” starring Ryan Gosling and George Clooney. Willimon then scored big with “House of Cards,” the political drama series with Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright that made Netflix a power in the TV business. So I was a little suspicious when I saw that the world premiere of his new play Breathing Time was going to be done by the tiny Fault Line Theatre company.

Still, I got myself down to Teatro IATI to see it. A small space on the same block as New York Theatre Workshop and La MaMa that barely seats 100 people, the theater was only half full at the performance I attended but I’m glad I made it there. Because Willimon has a great ear for dialog and this 90-minute play, crisply directed by Fault Line's co-artistic director Aaron Rossini, is a great showcase for his smart talk. 
It opens in an office shared by two lower-middle-rank guys in a Manhattan financial firm.  One is a play-by-the-rules family man who works with derivatives, the other is a go-for-broke bro assigned to marketing who arrives at work with a hangover even though he’s schedule to present a potentially career-changing idea to the board that morning. 

The guys trade insults, dreams and schemes until fate intervenes and changes the course of their lives. In the next scene two women who know them get together for drinks, dinner and a more uneasy conversation.  

There is a schematic quality to the play that makes it seem as though it were an early effort Willimon pulled out of his files rather than something he recently wrote. But the easy banter and the sensitivity to power dynamics that are his trademarks still command attention. Actors looking for fresh audition material or scene work should check out the script.

The acting in the current production is a tad monochromatic.  The actors find a suitable color for the characters they play and stick with it. Although the women are a little more daring than the men. I’ll be particularly interested in seeing what Molly Thomas, who adds fresh shadings to the role of a tightly wound suburban housewife, does next.  

Breathing Time is performed in the round, with the audience seated on two sides of the playing area.  I usually find those kinds of arrangements distracting but this time, I was almost as entertained by the facial expressions of a woman sitting across from me as she figured out what was going on in each scene as by the show itself.

The seating is first-come-first-serve, so if you’re thinking about going before the run ends on April 13, get there early and grab one in the section nearest the entrance.