From Jan: Samuel D. Hunter knew that he was going to alienate some
people by making a 600-pound man the central character in his new play The
Whale. As he told the online theater magazine TDF Stages, “I wanted to set it up where the audience was
keeping this character at arm’s length at first, and then gradually shrink that
distance.” The problem is that the distance never shrank for me.
I just couldn't get past my discomfort with the character’s size.
That surprised me because I'm not usually a looksist and, God knows, I
could stand to lose a few pounds myself. But my visceral unease also made
me realize that it wouldn't be fair for me to write about the play. Luckily I saw it with my theatergoing buddy Bill, who has agreed to share
his less prejudiced view of the show with you:
I thought I knew what to expect from The Whale. In one major
sense, I was right. In most others, I
was wrong—which, as this longish (one hour fifty minutes when I saw it two weeks ago) one-act play
unfolded, was what fascinated me.
Playwrights Horizons bills Samuel Hunter’s new play (first produced in
Denver and upcoming at Chicago’s Victory
Gardens and California’s South Coast Rep) as
being about “a six-hundred pound recluse [who] hides away in his
apartment eating himself to death.” And
yep, that’s what it’s about.
PH also describes it, with what I took to be the usual hype, as “big-hearted and fiercely funny.” Yep again, that’s what I found it to be—as well as eccentric and, ultimately and unexpectedly, moving. In retrospect, I’ve come to think of The Whale as part of a trilogy of like-minded plays that I’ve very much enjoyed over the past six months or so, each of which smartly, touchingly and with good will and great good humor focuses on a particular out-of-the-mainstream central character.
PH also describes it, with what I took to be the usual hype, as “big-hearted and fiercely funny.” Yep again, that’s what I found it to be—as well as eccentric and, ultimately and unexpectedly, moving. In retrospect, I’ve come to think of The Whale as part of a trilogy of like-minded plays that I’ve very much enjoyed over the past six months or so, each of which smartly, touchingly and with good will and great good humor focuses on a particular out-of-the-mainstream central character.
The other two plays in my make-believe trilogy are Nina
Raine’s Tribes, whose central figure is
a youngish deaf man, and Simon Stephens' The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, whose hero is a 15-year-old
savant who attends a school for
special-needs youngsters and who appears to have Asperger’s Syndrome,
though that phrase is never mentioned
(to my recollection). Tribes has been playing in Greenwich Village since March 4th and
continues through January 6th. The Curious
Incident..., which just closed at London’s National Theater but is
scheduled to move to the West End in
March, was screened worldwide recently as part of the National’s bargain-price, wonderful “live”
ntlive.com commercial-movie-theater
program (for which I’ve become a shameless shill). I saw both of these
plays twice and liked each even more the
second time.
When I hear the word whale, I make three literary
associations. The first is just a joke,
from the musical Wonderful Town. Awkwardly trying to make party conversation, one character says she’s been
re-reading "Moby-Dick." Silence. “It’s
about this whale,” she continues, to no good effect. Well, Hunter’s The
Whale also turns out to be partly about
"Moby-Dick." And about the biblical Jonah, too
(he of the whale misadventure), in ways that become more and more clear
as the play progresses, though there are
early references to each, both verbally and even visually, the latter in a subtle way that audiences should be
allowed the pleasure of discovering on
their own.
Till now, I’d seen Shuler Hensley onstage only in musicals, but
my gosh he’s an accomplished “straight”
actor. Wearing a huge “fat suit,” he makes Charlie into an appealing figure—no
small feat in playing a gay man so morbidly obese and slovenly that he chooses to make his living online,
tutoring young, mediocre students in the
craft of essay writing, unseen by them and vice versa.
Quite accomplished too are the other four members of The
Whale’s small cast, playing the roles of
Charlie’s estranged, hateful and hate-filled teenage daughter (Reyna de Courcy, all angles and
bile); his ex-wife (Tasha Lawrence, brusque but surprisingly sympathetic);
Charlie’s best, perhaps only, friend and
de facto caregiver (Cassie Beck, warmly direct); and a Mormon missionary (Cory Michael Smith, late of
the needlessly salaciously titled Cock
and quite nicely different here).
As The Whale slowly unfolds, the latter two characters are revealed to have unexpected relationships to Charlie—unexpected but dramatically credible.
As The Whale slowly unfolds, the latter two characters are revealed to have unexpected relationships to Charlie—unexpected but dramatically credible.
It’s that slow unfolding, though, that was for me the
singular failing of this otherwise
greatly satisfying play. Unlike Tribes and Dog in the Night-Time, which barrel along, The Whale takes its sweet
time, a drawback in a play that sets up
very little conflict among its characters to begin with. And when the play finally yields its secrets, and its
allusions to "Moby-Dick" and to the Jonah story are fully revealed, the revelations are a tad too cryptically brief to
be thoroughly absorbed and fulfilling. I
could have used a little less “middle” and
little more “ending.”
But along the way (as an essay by one of Charlie’s online
tutees might have put it), the time that
I spent with Hunter’s characters gave me enormous pleasure (pun intended). Individually they might seem
to be potential clichés. But with empathy and expertise, Hunter has woven them into a rich, luminous
tapestry.
No comments:
Post a Comment